User talk:Lemostr00

RE:Dividing Evangelion Units in other pages (Rebuild)
Hello there! I'm kind of surprised I've never written anything on your talk page...

Anyways, about the Evas. I think we should wait and see what does the new movie reveal, after all, many things can change from one movie to the other, like what happened with the "preview" of 3.0. Maybe the 3.0 + 1.0 will make it clear what they are, because at least Unit-08 seems to be something more than a simple Eva. We may also see what happened during the time skip so for now, I think it's best to leave them as they are.

To be honest, we need a better policy about how to deal with continuities, because Eva has so many of them, is hard to put everything in a single page and make it look clear and not confusing. Maybe we should separate everything into its own canon, like the Resident Evil Wiki does, but that means a lot of work.

If you have any suggestion or idea, let me hear it and we can discuss it. ~ The Maverick  013  06:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

I am in favor of dividing the content between series but we should discuss with others how to do it and how. There is this aspect of the many options we have (For example, the Anime, movies, manga and games), the most troublesome are the games, since each one does have different events (for example, eva: battlefields is based on events of the rebuild series, iron maiden is based on events of the original series, and other with new and original stories that doesn't fit. I did separate the TV angel from the movie angels in the fandom, but for characters I don't care much about it (But one case which I have some interest is the Kaworu Nagisa page, since the First Angel/13th angel thing, it is the last one to touch, but I still didn't.

There is a another problem: the naming conventions, for example, evangelion unit-08 is the "conventional" name, but in the movies material books, the correct name used is "Multipurpose Humanoid Decisive Weapon, Artificial Human Evangelion Unit-08 alpha" and even the Rebuild name itself. The movies in the original were never called Rebuild of Evangelion, it was a tentative name that was used briefly in the announcement but later dropped when the usual Jo came about. I know it is easier, but it is still incorrect to use, dunno what you and others think about it.

We should strive for more information, regardless of the outcome of these discussions, the english fandom page is quite lacking content, even comparing with the spanish or french versions, sure there are less dedicated users, but still, it is quite bothersome for me at least.


 * I think you should tell Ursuul about adding to or separating the articles, he'll be helping around here to prepare the place for the new movie. That way your edits won't conflict with his.


 * As for the naming conventions, I would favor the conventional names for characters and Evas, as I think those are the most commonly used by the people. The "Rebuild" name is a difficult one, I'm well aware of the real name but practically no one uses it. It became so common that I fear changing it would cause confusion. But on the other hand, the proper name should be favored, I guess. ~ The Maverick  013  00:26, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

What's wrong with my summary of the ending of evangelion 3.0+1.0
Excuse me,I see you are the reason for reverting my summary of the ending of evangelion 3.0+1.0 ,but Its true I did watch the scene and I believe that Shinji did rewrite reality by changing it into a world without Evas and Angels transforming it into a world similar to our own,Then we cut many years later where Shinji is a now older and is an ordinary salary man in this new reality at the train and takes a peek from a distance to see Rei and Kaworu who are likely normal humans and a couple and are probably going a on date and Asuka who is now human instead of a clone and is a businesswoman in this new reality is shown sitting on bench texting on her phone .he surprisingly meets Mari in this new reality who is probably his girlfriend in htis new reality and must have remembered the original reality like him especially that they hold hands and run out of the station together into the bright future that awaits them.

Therefore, my summary of the ending of evangelion 3.0+1.0 is not fan fiction,its true and that Mari is now Shinji's girlfriend in this new reality.Jamesnight64598 (talk) 05:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Simple, you are writing about what you want to see, not what is seen. Look at Rei and Kaworu, they were staring at each other, that is it, there isn't anything that says that they were dating, nothing like that, no matter how much you want it to be. Another example, Asuka, where does it state that she is a businesswoman? did she show the viewer her documents? No, she didn't, so don't add things that you want to be, only add things that can be seen, make it neutral (even when you deleted a whole paragraph that stated what was happening in the scene with a more fanfiction interpretation.

RE:Violating articles
It is indeed possible, but doing that is usually discouraged to avoid stopping genuine users from helping. ~ The Maverick  013  17:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

ANIMA stuff
One guy who's read ANIMA is supplying me with long summaries on it. I know you edit a lot of this stuff so you might want to extract info from it, here. It is however currently very, very large, and I'm not sure how to trim it down. He has only given me a summary for the last volume for now, but told me he'd write summaries for the other four volumes too, and make them shorter. FelipeFritschF (talk) 00:42, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Organization Navbar Color
Hey, I know we've had our issues in the past, mostly caused by a lack of communication, so I want to try and be more cooperative when it comes to big stuff like this by trying to have a proper discussion. I think it's really clear that we both want to improve the wiki so I think it would be nice if we could be on friendlier terms. There's obviously a lot of stuff I didn't know about early on which caused some issues but I think I've learned at least a little bit so I should be less of a nuance from now on.

Anyways, getting to the point, I was wondering what your thoughts on the organization and color were, I tried to keep the NERV stuff together at the front so that's why the order is a little odd though I think it makes the most sense that way. For the color I went with red since it wasn't taken for any of the other bars (to my knowledge anyways) and I thought it looked nice, I tried lime green but it felt kind of loud so I didn't bother trying any other bright colors since I think they would have the same issue.

I don't think I missed anything on the list, ANIMA should probably have NERV US and Germany too but they don't have pages for them and I can't really make them since I haven't gotten around to reading past the first volume yet.

Obviously order and color are going to be entirely personal preference but since you're just as if not more active than I am I figure it shouldn't just be my personal preferences. ArxisOne (talk) 20:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

The color doesn't matter as long it works both in night and light mode, making the contrast visible

New Theatrical Edition
I'm not trying to argue about this but if we're going to go by the official name then wouldn't it be best to also change the other tabs to match? I just think it would be best if we should just pick one and stick to it for the sake of continuity between the nav bars. I don't really care which that happens to be, I just think they should all be the same or as similar as possible. ArxisOne (talk) 04:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

That was a problem long before I've been here. I talked with others about it. Since the idea that the name rebuild is something official (it isn't, the original name of the project was Rebuild of Evangelion (tentative name), and it was in english back when first announced, the name stayed, the only use of the name rebuild officially are the extras in BD Rebuild of EVANGELION: 3.33.

I left the other templates with the usual Rebuild even when it is wrong, but left the series template with the official name since it was basically the only template where it really matters and is important, since it is about the various series.

But you can use rebuild on the series if you want, I guess I will just create a redirect to use if someone wants to type the official name and not the original one.

I didn't realize there was already a conversation about that, I've come around to your perspective so it's fine as it is. I'm a little conflicted since from what I understand in the west it's more common to call them rebuild with the numbers but I'm well aware that NTE is the series name so I agree you're right in keeping NTE for at least that section. Sorry for bringing up the issue, I was just going through the nav bars since I noticed some stuff was missing italics or other minor issues and thought it was something that needed fixing.ArxisOne (talk) 16:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

ANIMA Character pages
I was looking at Shinji's character page and after seeing the ANIMA section I started thinking the characters should have their own tabs for ANIMA, they all have a lot of stuff going on that's completely separate (or I guess not in since it's a sequel) from Neon Genesis and I feel like the scope of the information is being restricted since it's all being relegated to a subheading of a subheading. For the manga it makes sense since the manga and show are essentially the same barring a few differences here and there but ANIMA is more like rebuild. Separating them out would probably make the character pages cleaner too.

I mean, the character pages in general have a lot of formatting issues and bloat from being copied over from Eva geeks, at some point they'll probably need to be formatted like the Eva pages so they all at least roughly match but I think a good first step could be splitting off ANIMA into a third tab.

Anyways, you're the ANIMA guy so I figured it would be good to get your opinion on the matter, I think it would be good but I'm not going to do anything or commit to anything unless you're on board with it. ArxisOne (talk) 17:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)